[Date Prev][Date Next]
[cdn-nucl-l] Re: cdn-nucl-l digest, Vol 1 #2855 - Radiation's Benefits ?? -CORRECTION
My previous message gave incorrect citations The correct ones are
It is important to ensure that the whole story about the effects of Co-60
contaminated buildings is discussed.
Lin et al (Prolonged time to pregnancy in residents exposed to ionising
radiation in cobalt-60-contaminated buildings. Occup Environ Med. 2010
Mar;67(3):187-95. Epub 2009 Sep 22) suggest that exposure to low-dose
ionising radiation in cobalt-60-contaminated buildings may decrease
fertility, especially in females.
Chang et al (Cytogenetic effect of chronic low-dose, low-dose-rate
gamma-radiation in residents of irradiated buildings. Lancet. 1997 Aug
2;350(9074):330-3) suggest that chronic low-dose and low-dose-rate
gamma-ray environmental exposure in these buildings may induce
cytogenetic damage in human beings.
I have not searched for reviews/critiques of either of these
From: "Jerry Cuttler" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Canadian Nuclear Discussion List"
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 22:49:49 -0400
Subject: [cdn-nucl-l] Fw: National Post, Financial Post: Radiation's
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Interesting correspondence ...
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Shirley Sanders=20
To: JERRY CUTTLER=20
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: National Post, Financial Post: Radiation's benefits
Jerry: You made by day. Thanks for passing this on.=20
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:41 PM, JERRY CUTTLER
Some good publicity for your
Leo M. Lowe, Ph.D., P.Phys., CRadP