[cdn-nucl-l] Positive Void Reactivity EC6 and CANDU 6

To: "cdn-nucl-l@mailman.McMaster.CA" <cdn-nucl-l@mailman1.cis.mcmaster.ca>
Subject: [cdn-nucl-l] Positive Void Reactivity EC6 and CANDU 6
From: Daniel Meneley <Daniel.Meneley@uoit.ca>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:49:05 -0500
Accept-language: en-US, en-CA
Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-CA
Content-language: en-US
List-archive: <http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/private/cdn-nucl-l/>
List-help: <mailto:cdn-nucl-l-request@mailman.McMaster.CA?subject=help>
List-id: Canadian Nuclear Discussion List <cdn-nucl-l.mailman.McMaster.CA>
List-post: <mailto:cdn-nucl-l@mailman.McMaster.CA>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/cdn-nucl-l>,<mailto:cdn-nucl-l-request@mailman.McMaster.CA?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/cdn-nucl-l>,<mailto:cdn-nucl-l-request@mailman.McMaster.CA?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: Acq/IlHEFPcgrjrtRU2Jd3QhTZaJ2A==
Thread-topic: Positive Void Reactivity EC6 and CANDU 6

Andrew: Read the two papers on this subject in the Proceedings of the June 2009 CNS conference.

The safety issue of positive void in CANDU is CLOSED. It never was really an issue, but it took some work to prove this fact.

Dan