[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Archive Top]

[cdn-nucl-l] WSJ, The Climate Science Isn't Settled



This article appeared in the National Post / Financial Post today on Page FP15.
 
I've met this professor and heard him speak at the U of T.  He's a very knowledgeable and capable scientist.
 
Jerry
------------------------
 
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703939404574567423917025400.html
 

The Wall Street Journal

 

OPINION

NOVEMBER 30, 2009, 7:44 P.M. ET

The Climate Science Isn't Settled

Confident predictions of catastrophe are unwarranted.

Is there a reason to be alarmed by the prospect of global warming? Consider that the measurement used, the globally averaged temperature anomaly (GATA), is always changing. Sometimes it goes up, sometimes down, and occasionally—such as for the last dozen years or so—it does little that can be discerned.

 

Claims that climate change is accelerating are bizarre. There is general support for the assertion that GATA has increased about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit since the middle of the 19th century. The quality of the data is poor, though, and because the changes are small, it is easy to nudge such data a few tenths of a degree in any direction. Several of the emails from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) that have caused such a public ruckus dealt with how to do this so as to maximize apparent changes.

 

The general support for warming is based not so much on ...

 

 

____________

 

Mr. Lindzen is professor of meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.