[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Archive Top]

Re: [cdn-nucl-l] Windmills: bigger waste than eHealth

how were they able to achieve consensus on nuclear, coal, wind, gas, and presumably solar?
don't they have a "variety" of opinions within on the different sources, or are they a one or two-person show?

R.


On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Brown, Morgan <brownmj@aecl.ca> wrote:
UNRESTRICTED | ILLIMITÉ

Yes, Energy Probe is anti-nuclear, pro-coal, anti-wind, formerly strongly pro-gas but not anymore.  They are against anything that has any subsidies.  EP believe that markets are self regulating and are the best way to operate society.
 

- Morgan

 

 

 -----Original Message-----
From: cdn-nucl-l-admin@mailman1.cis.McMaster.CA [mailto:cdn-nucl-l-admin@mailman1.cis.McMaster.CA]On Behalf Of Andrew Daley
Sent: October 15, 2009 12:56 PM
To: Canadian Nuclear Discussion List
Subject: Re: [cdn-nucl-l] Windmills: bigger waste than eHealth

Interesting indeed...
 
Another intersting tid-bit is the author's affiliation (energy probe)... a group whose other members sometimes appear in the same newspaper arguing against Nuclear...

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:53 PM, JERRY CUTTLER <jerrycuttler@rogers.com> wrote:




CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED INFORMATION NOTICE

This e-mail, and any attachments, may contain information that
is confidential, subject to copyright, or exempt from disclosure.
Any unauthorized review, disclosure, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of or reliance on this information 
may be unlawful and is strictly prohibited.  

AVIS D'INFORMATION CONFIDENTIELLE ET PRIVILÉGIÉE

Le présent courriel, et toute pièce jointe, peut contenir de 
l'information qui est confidentielle, régie par les droits 
d'auteur, ou interdite de divulgation. Tout examen, 
divulgation, retransmission, diffusion ou autres utilisations 
non autorisées de l'information ou dépendance non autorisée 
envers celle-ci peut être illégale et est strictement interdite.