Re: [cdn-nucl-l] Climate Action Nework

[Randal Leavitt <randal.leavitt@rogers.com>]

Neil Craik wrote:
>
> Copies of the overhead was not available, so I may have the years 
> wrong, but have any of you heard of this “only hydro needed to save 
> the climate “ gospel ? Has any one seen the nonsense overhead before ?
>
Using water dams to produce electricity is dangerous. More people are 
killed by the building and operating of water dams than by nuclear 
fission electricity generation. Given two choices - safer nuclear 
fission and dangerous water dams - why would I want the dangerous 
option? The same reasoning applies to cost and number of animals killed. 
Why would I want expensive water dams if inexpensive fission systems are 
possible? Why would I want animal killing water dams if fission systems 
that harm very few animals are possible?

-- 
Randal Leavitt - another Ubuntu user
http://positiveenergy.blogspot.com/
http://www.simpy.com/user/randalleavitt/links
http://tinyurl.com/hgvmg