[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: [cdn-nucl-l] Climate Action Nework
Neil Craik wrote:
> Copies of the overhead was not available, so I may have the years
> wrong, but have any of you heard of this “only hydro needed to save
> the climate “ gospel ? Has any one seen the nonsense overhead before ?
Using water dams to produce electricity is dangerous. More people are
killed by the building and operating of water dams than by nuclear
fission electricity generation. Given two choices - safer nuclear
fission and dangerous water dams - why would I want the dangerous
option? The same reasoning applies to cost and number of animals killed.
Why would I want expensive water dams if inexpensive fission systems are
possible? Why would I want animal killing water dams if fission systems
that harm very few animals are possible?
Randal Leavitt - another Ubuntu user