[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Archive Top]

Re: [Bulk] [cdn-nucl-l] " Energy minister, aides clash over conservation"

Jaro wrote:

> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060512.ONTNUCLEAR12/TPStory/National
>
>
> *
>
> Energy minister, aides clash over conservation
>
> Sources say senior Ontario bureaucrats oppose Cansfield's green ambitions
>
> *

Ms Cansfield wants us all to "conserve" so she won't have to approve new
nuclear plants.  For me the word "conserve" is code for a reduced living
standard: much shorter life span, more hunger, more sickness, cold in
winter, sweating in summer.  I don't think I want to go through all this
when it is not necessary.  I don't want to endure all this misery just
because Ms Cansfield can't be bothered to learn about fission.

And she wants us to use more natural gas - pipelines of explosive gas
extending everywhere inside the city.  What madness!  During the last
couple of decades several buildings in Ottawa have been destroyed by gas
explosions.  Who would ever want to increase this dangerous practice?

-- 
Randal Leavitt ---------- gnupg public key: bbbad04d
http://positiveenergy.blogspot.com/
http://de.lirio.us/rubric/entries/user/RandalLeavitt