I certainly hope the gov't recognizes a scripted response when the see one. The same thing happened in Ottawa last night, with Elizabeth May (Sierra Club) jumping up before the moderator was finished his opening remarks. Fortunately these actors and their scripts are well known. Unfortunately for the rest of us they hijack these events and limit the opportunity for real information to be shared (in both directions).
Jeremy Whitlock
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdn-nucl-l-admin@mailman1.cis.McMaster.CA
> [mailto:cdn-nucl-l-admin@mailman1.cis.McMaster.CA] On Behalf Of Jaro
> Sent: February 14, 2006 7:00 AM
> To: multiple cdn
> Subject: [cdn-nucl-l] " Nuclear power proposal slammed "
>
>
>
> http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thesta
> r/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1139871011914&call_pageid
> =970599119419
> Nuclear power proposal slammed
> Plan proposes $40B in new Ontario stations Consultation
> process described as a sham
> Feb. 14, 2006. 01:00 AM
> PETER GORRIE AND MIKE FUNSTON, STAFF REPORTERS
>
> A plan that recommends $40 billion worth of new nuclear power
> for Ontario was slammed at public hearings last night in
> Toronto and Mississauga.
>
> At the Toronto meeting more than 250 people appeared just as
> angry about what they described as a sham three-day
> consultation process that continues today and tomorrow across
> the province.
>
> In Mississauga, even before moderator John Crane finished his
> opening remarks to about 150 people, Greenpeace
> representative Dave Martin slammed the legitimacy of the process.
>
> "We are getting three days of consultation this week on 11
> days' notice and we are expected to produce comments off the
> cuff and we're being told this is good public consultation. I
> don't think so," said Martin.
>
> "The (pro-nuclear) bias of the minister of energy is coming
> out loud and clear," said Kim Fry, who has started a group
> called Mothers Against Nuclear.
>
> Yesterday's public hearings come on the heels of a report by
> the Ontario Power Authority that recommended nuclear energy
> should continue to represent about half of the province's
> electricity supply up to 2025.
>
> Jeff Leal, parliamentary assistant to Energy Minister Donna
> Cansfield, however, suggested last night that the plan's
> hostile reception might delay a final decision.
>
> Speaker after speaker last night argued nuclear power is
> expensive, unreliable and dangerous to the environment and
> human health.
>
> But several representatives of the nuclear industry extolled
> the virtues of nuclear power.
>
> Nuclear physicist Nathalie Gagnon demonstrated a model of a
> nuclear fuel bundle about one metre long powered by eight
> tiny radioactive pellets.
>
> She said it could provide power to a home for 100 years
> without any air pollution.
> She urged people not to be afraid of nuclear power, adding
> people tend to associate it with nuclear weapons and it's the
> not same thing.
>
> The Ontario Power Authority was created by the provincial
> Liberal government to plan for the province's looming
> electricity crisis, which includes aging nuclear power
> plants, a plan to shut down coal-powered generating plans and
> warnings that downtown Toronto risks rolling blackouts in two years.
>
> Other speakers said the government has not only
> underestimated the potential of renewable energy sources like
> solar and wind, but has also undermined those efforts with
> its announcement last Friday of the low price cap on the
> electricity consumed by industry.
CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED INFORMATION NOTICE This e-mail, and any attachments, may contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright, or exempt from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, disclosure, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or reliance on this information may be unlawful and is strictly prohibited. AVIS D'INFORMATION CONFIDENTIELLE ET PRIVILÉGIÉE Le présent courriel, et toute pièce jointe, peut contenir de l'information qui est confidentielle, régie par les droits d'auteur, ou interdite de divulgation. Tout examen, divulgation, retransmission, diffusion ou autres utilisations non autorisées de l'information ou dépendance non autorisée envers celle-ci peut être illégale et est strictement interdite. |