[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Archive Top]

[cdn-nucl-l] CANDU is the answer



I am reading:

"The Future of Nuclear Power"
An Interdisciplinary MIT Study
Date: 2003

http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/

I liked this bit:

"Thus our most important recommendation is:

For the next decades, government and industry in the U.S. and 
elsewhere should give priority to the deployment of the once-through 
fuel cycle, rather than the development of more expensive closed fuel 
cycle technology involving reprocessing and new advanced thermal or 
fast reactor technologies."

So MIT agrees - AECL got it right and CANDU is the answer.

-- 
================================================
Randal Leavitt        gnupg public key: bbbad04d
Registered User 267646 at http://counter.li.org/