[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Archive Top]
[cdn-nucl-l] CANDU is the answer
I am reading:
"The Future of Nuclear Power"
An Interdisciplinary MIT Study
Date: 2003
http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/
I liked this bit:
"Thus our most important recommendation is:
For the next decades, government and industry in the U.S. and
elsewhere should give priority to the deployment of the once-through
fuel cycle, rather than the development of more expensive closed fuel
cycle technology involving reprocessing and new advanced thermal or
fast reactor technologies."
So MIT agrees - AECL got it right and CANDU is the answer.
--
================================================
Randal Leavitt gnupg public key: bbbad04d
Registered User 267646 at http://counter.li.org/