[cdn-nucl-l] First French EPR to be built in Flamanville (Normandy)

["Jerry Cuttler" <jerrycuttler@rogers.com>]

There seems to be more public and government acceptance of nuclear power in
France than in Canada.  We need to understand why and take appropriate
action.
------------------------------------------------

See article at:
http://www.ecolo.org/archives/archives-nuc-en/2004-10-21-EPR-Flamanville.htm
(Archived on Oct 21, 2004 at:
http://www.ecolo.org/archives/archives-nuc-en/ )

The First French EPR will be built in Flamanville (Normandy)

(Apology: the EPR being a French reactor, the literature available about it
(including some of EFN's documents) is mainly in French. Some of the links
proposed below may therefore be in French. To translate these documents to
English, if necessary, you can use the free Google-automatic translation
service at http://www.google.fr/language_tools?hl=en )

Dear friends of clean nuclear energy,

EDF has confirmed the site where will be built the first French EPR
(EUROPEAN PRESSURIZED REACTOR). It will be Flamanville, in Normandy, where
two pressurized water reactors of 1330 MW each are already in operation..

The sites of Tricastin (on the Rhône river) and Penly (in Seine-maritime, on
the seaside) were also candidates to host this new EPR. It was however
preferable to install the reactor on the seaside (which eliminated
Tricastin), and as concerns the site of Penly, Laurent Fabius, a local
political leader, former Prime Minister and member of French Parliament, had
campaigned against the EPR together with the Greens, which probably played
against Penly.

The President of EDF (ELECTRICITE DE FRANCE, the world's largest electrical
utility, which owns and operates all of France's 58 nuclear reactors),
Pierre Gadonneix, has confirmed the choice of Flamanville on thursday 21st
october 2004, after a board meeting of EDF.

This decision had been delayed since many years and was becoming urgent. See
about this subject the schedule for the EPR.
In 2005 and 2006, administrative procedures will take place, before the
construction starts in 2007.

The reactor should be in operation by 2012.

The 58 existing French nuclear reactors, are to be replaced starting in 2020
This lead-unit EPR reactor is meant to validate the new EPR concept and
design, before building a series of EPR's to replace the 58 existing
reactors. The EPR is not a revolutionary reactor, but an optimized version
of the pressurized water reactors in operation today, who already work very
well and are quite clean and very safe.

The French National Safety Authority (Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire - ASN)
had authorized the EPR project to proceed on October 5th, indicating that
this reactor includes significant improvements compared to existing
reactors. The EPR has better safety systems, is more competitive, reduces
the amount of waste produced and lowers the exposition of nuclear workers to
radioactivity.

Constructing the EPR will take 5 years. But beforehand, there are 2 years of
administrative procedures, and to test it properly before constructing a
series, the EPR needs to operate at least until the first refuelling period,
which requires another 18 months to 2 years. Adding up these time spans, one
realizes that 2004 is the deadline if we want to have EPR's constructed by
series, tested properly, and the following units on-line in 2020, This
decision was therefore quite urgent and needed to be taken nowadays.

Humanity continues to reject into the atmosphere 800 tonnes per seconde of
CO2 which contributes to the greenhouse effect. Each EPR such as the one to
be built in Flamanville will spare 4 million tons of CO2 from being rejected
into the atmosphere every year.

Constructing this EPR in Normandy is good news for the local environment in
Normandy, good news also for the country and for the planet. This will help
preserve France and Europe from being too greatly dependent of imported oil.
While warfare continues in Irak, Saoudi Arabia is more unstable than ever,
and English natural gas production, which used to help Europe not to be
totally dependent on the Persian Gulf, is now starting to decline this year.

The EPR is a EUROPEAN project, putting together the best European
technologies. Born from the very start of a Franco-German cooperation
(between Framatome and Siemens, now united in Areva), the first EPR was
bought in 2003 by Finland, a country with a high reputation of ecological
consciousness, and is planned to be operating in 2010. The new EPR in
Flamanville will be owned and operated by a european consortium comprising,
in addition to EDF, several other partners. Belgium, Spain and Italy, among
others, seem to be interested and are considering a participation in the
consortium.

The financial investment (cost of building the reactor) will be about 3
billion euros. This may seem to be a large amount, but the reactor will
produce huge quantities of high-value clean killowatts on-demand : 1600
megawatts, thereby amortizing the investment in a reasonably short time
span. Chine, for example, has bought two 900 MW nuclear reactors built by
Framatome at Daya Bay (which started operating in 1993 and 1994), the
construction cost of which was covered by the sales of the electricity
produced in far less than ten years of baseload production, and these
reactors will now probably continue producing until they are about 50 years
old, if not more.

While the price of fossile energies (oil, natural gas, coal) continues to
soar, the EPR is becoming highly competitive. It is not only a reliable
source of cheap electricity, much cheaper than fossile fuels, it also makes
France more independent of oil and of the emirs of Arab States which are
more unstable than ever. The Persian Gulf concentrates two thirds of the
remaining cheap oil reserves in the world.

The French EPR is not subsidized by the French authorities or other hidden
subsidies (contrary to renewable energies, which should also be developed,
but produce only minute quantities of energy, in an inconstant manner, and
cannot be developed without strong and continued financial backing). The
region and Département de Basse Normandie, to attract the EPR reactor on
their territory in the competition between the three sites, have agreed a
local professional tax exemption for the new EPR reactor of 100% the first
year, 80% the second, 60% the third, 40% the fourth and 20% the fifth year.
This fiscal gift will amount to 70 million euros in five years. This is only
a marginal advantage for EDF compared to the investment cost, but
nevertheless demonstrates the motivation of the region, of the Département
de Basse-Normandie and illustrates the support of local politicians to the
project.

Developing all clean energies, including nuclear energy, is necessary,
useful, and more urgent today than ever before. Nuclear energy is the only
energy available capable of replacing in two or three decades a significant
proportion of today's fossile energies. However, even a massive developement
of nuclear capacity in the world will not suffice to face the planet's
energy needs when oil will run short.

EFN demands that in addition to a strong come-back and development of
nuclear energy around the world, strong support be also given to energy
conservation, geothermal energy (heat pumps), solar thermal energy (hot
water), and to the development of clean vehicles.

Some dreamers and anti-nuclear organizations pretend that building more
windmills would be a better solution for France than an EPR. Click here to
discover how many of the most modern windmills (twice as high as the
cathedral of Paris) are needed to replace an EPR such as the one that will
be constructed in Flamanville.

The United States, China, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, and Finland (among
others), are running nuclear today or planning to go nuclear again, in part
because of nuclear energy's environmental advantages.

EFN totally approves the wise decision taken by the French Government and
EDF to build the EPR.

EFN has in fact strongly contributed to the preparation of this positive
decision to build the EPR since several years, by informing the public about
the benefits of clean nuclear energy and the necessity of an EPR, by our
interviews and articles in the news media, through our mailing list in
French language, our web site in French (www.ecolo.org and click on the
French flag, or just click here), our participation in public debates, our
lectures given throughout France (several hundred lectures given all around
the country since EFN was created). Our goal is now to develop and duplicate
EFN's actions in as many other countries as possible. If you are willing to
help us in this regard, please contact EFN.

About the EPR, see for example the script of my radio interview on RMC (one
of the biggest radio stations in France) discussing the merits of the EPR
with Corinne Lepage in november 2003 (Corinne Lepage is a notorious
anti-nuclear lawyer and political personality in France).

EFN was also the NGO who contributed the most in the "National debate on
energies" which was held during the first semester of 2003 in France, paving
the road for the National Energy Law in 2004, defining the major energy
orientations for France in the next 30 years. In total, about 40 different
events, expositions and lectures were orgainzed by EFN to inform the public
in thie context of this National Debate.

It is essential to produce electricity cleanly, and to free our world from
its addiction of burning oil and fossile resources, whilst oil reserves are
already significantly depleted. To avoid a major crash of our modern
societies when oil wells around the world start running dry, humanity should
rapidly undertake what France has done in 1973 : at least produce its
baseload electricity with clean nuclear energy. In the meanwhile, France and
existing nuclear countries will need to replace the existing reactors when
they arrive at the end of their service lives. The next step, beyond
electricity generation, is to get rid of oil for transportation. We are
lucky enough to have several solutions at hand : hydrogen/fuel cells (the
hydrogen being produced by nuclear reactors) and in the very short term,
developing electric vehicles (well adapted to short distances such as
commuting) or hybrid vehicles such as the Toytota Prius (for longer
distances). The storage capacity of the batteries of electric vehicles have
much improved in the recent years and their range is now above 200 km (more
than enough for most commuters and small local use such as driving the kids
to school).

For more information on nuclear energy, on the EPR, or its competitors such
as the AP1000 or AP600, you may refer to our "documents" section (in
English) on the web site. There, you will find hundreds of documents,
including some exclusive ones, in a dozen languages, about energy and the
environment. You will also learn about other new types of reactors,
renewable energies, natural radioactivity, energy concservation, the rapid
depletion of oil reserves, and much, much more, all this for FREE (just
visit the web site) !

Sincerely and ecologically yours,
Bruno Comby
President of EFN