|
I thought you might like to read my recent CNS
paper. It is now on the EFN web site.
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: What becomes of nuclear risk? Re: EFN - Green
Opposition to Nuclear Energy was a Historical Mistake
Thanks, this document is received
and installed on the web site in the "documents" section. Have a nice day !
Bruno
Jerry Cuttler wrote:
----- Original Message -----
To: nuc-en@ecolo.orgSent: Thursday, July
29, 2004 2:49 PM Subject: What becomes of nuclear risk? Re: EFN - Green
Opposition to Nuclear Energy was a Historical Mistake Dear Bruno, Thank you so much for the excellent article that you sent
me. In return, I'm
pleased to attach the paper that I contributed to this year's (25th) annual
conference of the Canadian Nuclear Society. Best wishes for an enjoyable
summer. Yours
truly, Jerry
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 12:24
PM
Subject: EFN - Green Opposition to
Nuclear Energy was a Historical Mistake
 |
EFN -
NEWS
Newsletter of
EFN
Environmentalists For
Nuclear Energy
29th July
2004 |
This document is archived on the
internet and can be consulted at the following address: http://www.ecolo.org/archives/archives-nuc-en/ Green Opposition
to Nuclear Energy was a Historical Mistake
Environmentalists now consider
nuclear energy as clean
by Bruno Comby
As a dedicated environmentalist, I consider it paradoxical to see some
environmental groups opposed to nuclear energy. Green opposition to nuclear
power plants is in fact a major historical mistake. Their announced concerns
are for health, safety, and the protection of nature. In these respects
nuclear power is by far superior to the alternatives - burning fossil fuels
(coal, petroleum and gas) which pollute the atmosphere, wind turbines or the
use of solar photovoltaic cells for the production of electricity, and
biomass (growing crops to be burned and burning crop residues) which alter
the landscape and produce only minute amounts of energy.
snip ...
|