[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Archive Top]

[cdn-nucl-l] " Earth At Risk: New Calls For Planetary Defense "



http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planetary_defense_040225.html
Earth At Risk: New Calls For Planetary Defense
By Leonard David
Senior Space Writer
posted: 10:52 am ET
25 February 2004

GARDEN GROVE, California - It is past time to get serious about planetary
defense, experts say. The threat of Earth being on the receiving end of a
cosmic calling card in the form of an asteroid or comet is real. 

Despite increasing scientific agreement regarding the danger posed by
near-Earth objects smashing into our planet, governmental steps to deal with
the issue are missing-in-action. At present, only patchwork and under-funded
research efforts are underway to robustly detect, track, catalog and plot
out strategies to thwart menacing asteroids and comets that place Earth at
risk.  

An international confab of experts is taking part in The Planetary Defense
Conference: Protecting Earth from Asteroids here this week and sponsored by
The Aerospace Corporation and the American Institute of Aeronautics and
Astronautics (AIAA).

Tepid response

The four-days of discussion were kicked off by Congressman Dana Rohrabacher,
Chairman of the House Science Committee's Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee

Rohrabacher noted that it took the attacks of Sept. 11 for the country to
focus on global terrorism. "I hope that it won't take that type of
catastrophe for us to start paying attention to the threats of near-Earth
objects," he said.

The lawmaker said the political reaction to the worries over space rocks has
garnered "a very tepid response" to date, noting that money spent so far on
the issue has been "a pittance."

President George W. Bush's new visionary blueprint for NASA - including a
human return to the Moon and sending astronauts to Mars - was saluted by
Rohrabacher. That plan, he added, can also support planetary defense
objectives.
"The Moon could well be a base of operations that we could use as a means to
defend this planet in a timely way, and a more effective way, against near
Earth objects," Rohrabacher explained. 

Taking a "let's get going," roll-up-your sleeves attitude, Rohrabacher said
there is need to start now in readying the technologies necessary to deflect
an Earth-threatening object. "What we need to do is build from right
here...this moment. The people in this room can save the planet."

Warning time

There is no question that an asteroid has Earth's name on it, astronomers
agree. But where the rock is and when that impact is going to occur is
unknown, said David Morrison of the NASA Astrobiology Institute at the space
agency's Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, California. 

NASA now supports -- in collaboration with the United States Air Force --
the Spaceguard Survey and its goal of discovering and tracking 90 percent of
the Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs) with a diameter greater than about one-half
mile (1 kilometer) by 2008. If one of these big bruisers were to strike our
planet, it would spark catastrophic global effects that would include severe
regional devastation and global climate change.

By charting the whereabouts of these celestial objects, it is anticipated
that decades of warning time is likely if one of the large-sized space
boulders was found to be on a heading that intersects Earth. 

But a uniform message from the experts attending this week's planetary
defense gathering is extending the survey to spot smaller objects, down to
some 500 feet (150 meters) in diameter. These asteroids can wreak havoc too,
but on a more localized scale.

For instance, if one of these smaller asteroids were to strike along the
California coast, millions of people might be killed, Morrison said. A
little further to the east, he added, "a nice crater out in the desert"
would become a tourist attraction.

Find them early

In identifying ways to deal with hazardous asteroids, a first order of
business is gaining a better understanding of the enemy. That is, are they
fluffy stuff, constituting a rubble pile, or are they tough-as-nails slabs
of iron? Along with these physical properties, astronomers want to know more
about their overall shape, rotation rate, and whether an object might play
host to a smaller companion body. 

Developing a robust deflection scheme so an asteroid doesn't hit Earth means
taking into account these factors and a host of other issues, said Don
Yeomans, a leading asteroid and comet scientist at the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California.

Developing a viable mitigation campaign, Yeomans explained, demands three
prerequisites: "You need to find them early. You need to find them early.
And we need to find them early."

Friendly-fire

Now being discussed is a way to flex, test, and calibrate present day
computer and hardware tools to first detect and then keep a trained eye on a
potential Earth impactor.

There are currently three Earth-impactors en route. But don't worry. It's
all friendly fire. 

NASA's Genesis spacecraft is headed this way in September of this year. So
too is the Stardust spacecraft in January 2006, as will be a Japanese
asteroid sample mission in June 2007. All three are designed to reenter the
Earth's atmosphere and touch down on terra firma, each carrying a precious
cargo of scooped-up specimens.

"So we do have current impactors coming back," Yeomans said. While still in
the preliminary discussion stage, the idea is to use these incoming
spacecraft to shake out coordinated observations, sharpen orbit calculation
skills, and help fine-tune procedures now in place for detecting and
tracking asteroids and comets, he told SPACE.com.

Yeomans said about 40 objects at least 3 feet (1 meter) in size enter the
Earth's atmosphere every year. Some of these incoming objects have been
observed by space-based infrared and visible sensors and other ground-based
detection devices operated by the U.S. military and other government
agencies, he said.

"They have indeed made many of these observations available to scientific
investigators," Yeomans said. "It would be nicer to get these things [the
data] a little more quickly than 3-4 months down the road,' he added, with
near-simultaneous flow of information about such events seen as ideal.

Largest meteorite fall

Space and ground sensors proved useful last year in studying a major meteor
explosion in Earth's atmosphere. The event also brought home the point of
how a natural event can take on the guise of a human-made terrorist act.

Dee Pack, Director of The Aerospace Corporation's Remote Sensing Department,
detailed a large-scale meteorite fall that occurred over Park Forest,
Illinois on March 27, 2003.
"This is the largest meteorite fall over a densely populated area in modern
history," Pack and a team of fellow specialists reported at the meeting. The
initial mass of the object is now estimated to be nearly 8 tons. 
The explosion took place at nearly midnight local time. Fragments of the
airbursting meteorite cut through several roofs. The explosive
disintegration of the object lit up the night sky to daylight levels. Sonic
booms were heard over a wide area. Numbers of meteorites resulting from the
event were recovered, later classified as bits of a stony space rock.
Making it all the more jittery for those folks in the fall zone, the object
exploded during Operation Iraqi Freedom, with many witnesses worried this
natural event was some kind of massive explosion or nuclear event.

Pack and his colleagues contend: "These large meteors, or superbolides, are
of concern to the Department of Defense due to their ability to mimic
nuclear events." This type of extraordinary Earth-crossing object serves to
train global observers to better recognize and characterize these naturally
occurring huge explosive events.

Who do you call?

A clear and present danger for those studying planetary defense is the lack
of any chain-of-command to take on the duties of dealing with the prospect
of disruptive collisions from asteroids and comets. 
This "who do you call?" factor deserves immediate attention, said Michael
Belton of Belton Space Exploration Initiatives in Tucson, Arizona.

Belton detailed the findings of a NASA-sponsored 2002 workshop. It brought
together over 75 top scientists, engineers and military experts from the
United States, Europe, and Japan to review the science behind mitigating
hazardous comets and asteroids.

A central finding: There is lack of any assigned responsibility to any
national or international governmental organization to prepare for a
disruptive collision. There is absence of any authority to act in
preparation for some future collision-mitigation attempt, Belton said.

The 2002 workshop did recommend that NASA be assigned the duty to advance
work in beefing up the science and ability to respond to an imminent
collision with an asteroid or comet nucleus. Furthermore, the now-in
progress Spaceguard Survey should be extended to scope out possible
impactors down to 655 feet (200 meters) in size. 

In addition, Belton said that there is need for the Defense Department to
more rapidly communicate surveillance data on natural airbursts. And lastly,
there's need for governmental policy makers to formulate a chain of
responsibility for action in the event a threat to the Earth becomes known.

"In other words...there isn't anybody to call. There is nobody there. And
there's nobody with authority...nobody with any resources," Belton said.
"And we need to correct that."
==================================


http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/02/24/defending.earth.ap/index.html
Scientists want to be ready to block asteroid from hitting Earth
Tuesday, February 24, 2004 Posted: 1703 GMT ( 1:03 AM HKT)

GARDEN GROVE, California (AP) -- The asteroid believed to have wiped out
dinosaurs 65 million years ago was rare but hardly unique, say scientists
gathered to discuss ways of aggressively defending our planet from another
such space rock, including by detonating nukes in space. 

Asteroids capable of inflicting damage on a global scale hit the Earth
roughly every million years, and we shouldn't dawdle in developing a method
of deflecting them, say the scientists attending a four-day planetary
defense conference in suburban Orange County. 

Scientists have proposed a variety of strategies to nudge an asteroid off
course. The list is the stuff of science fiction and includes using lasers,
mirrors or atomic weapons launched from Earth. 

Unlike any other type of natural hazard, an asteroid impact could kill
billions of people. But it's also the only natural hazard that can be
prevented, at least in principle, scientists said. 
"It's a thing we know will happen sometime in our future so the responsible
thing is for people to do something about it," said William Ailor, of The
Aerospace Corp., which sponsored the conference with the American Institute
of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 

Astronomers estimate there are between 900 and 1,100 near-Earth asteroids
one kilometer -- about six-tenths of a mile -- or larger in diameter. Of
those, nearly 700 already have been discovered and cataloged. 
It's not clear what sort of damage one of those rocks could cause were it to
strike Earth, although destruction on a global scale is likely. 
"We don't know what they would do, and we don't want to conduct a science
experiment to find out," said David Morrison of NASA's Ames Research Center.


Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-California, introduced a bill this month to bolster
NASA spending on the search for near-Earth asteroids 100 yards or more
across. 
Even something of that size, were it to strike, say, the Pacific Ocean,
could generate a tsunami capable of destroying the major cities along the
West Coast, Ailor said. 

Early detection of an inbound asteroid could provide years to decades of
warning -- enough time to mount a mission to push it off course, Ailor said.
Slowing an asteroid down by even a few inches a second could change its
trajectory enough to prevent its ever crossing paths with the Earth. 

The Earth moves in space the equivalent of its own diameter in just six
minutes. So to move an Earth-bound asteroid off target, it would be enough
to delay its arrival time by six minutes, allowing it to harmlessly sweep
past, Morrison said. 
=========


<<attachment: winmail.dat>>