I'm not sure what the point is here -- is it being proposed that we abandon energy technologies with >10 years market penetration? Abandon technologies that are currently expensive, low energy density, environmentally unattractive, thermodynamically inefficient, but attractive to politicians?
Sounds to me like Energy Probe is advocating abandoning solar power and wind power. Is this true?
> From: Tom Adams [mailto:TomAdams@nextcity.com]
> Hydrogen is an obvious looser as a vehicular fuel (dangerous,
> low energy
> density, corrosive, expensive, thermodynamically unattractive,
> environmentally unattractive, and attractive to politicans). [...]